Soleron said:
Or is this just another speculative blog by someone without access to the details of the experiment? I am waiting for a peer-reviewed paper that either confirms or denies this observation. -- "But travel back in time?
No I don't agree.
You explain to me how that would work and I will gladly listen..." Dismissing something because it sounds absurd is not science. Look at the double slit experiment. I don't know how it would work, but there is nothing wrong with the concept as far as contradicting what we observe already. |
You have the right spirit. I expect something soon. But that's the best explanation I've heard and it comes from insider sources hehe.
"Dismissing something because it sounds absurd is not science. Look at the double slit experiment. I don't know how it would work, but there is nothing wrong with the concept as far as contradicting what we observe already."
My question would be how you would accelerate a human being to greater than c since we have tons of experience that it isn't even possible for particles as light as protons and neutrons.
Or were you only referring to 'signalling back in time'? For this I also disagree. Mostly because we haven't seen any signals yet 
but also because of HUP. Perhaps you can give me a peer-reviewed 
paper that develops the idea of time-travel?
