morenoingrato said:
But he did mention the great Dark Souls numbers before. And also, he did mention Type-0 this week I think, and has it ever occured you that he did not have any data of Type 0 at that point? And it is pretty bad if you are reading an article just to make fun of the writter and not for the numbers or the data. |
hmm i think you are fighting a losing battle here buddy.
about type-0..he constantly ignores it. the incident i mentioned was on titles that will sell well in coming months...it doesn't take a genius to figure out how Type-0 will be part of that....he didn't mention it as one of the bigger games for October either. I mean really?
and you are wrong. if what he does is funny, he will be made fun of. if people don't find it funny and just annoying, they will call him out on it. that's not bad at all. his obvious bias is so damn obvious, i used to get so annoyed with it..but then..it just became one big joke to me and hasn't stopped since. and keep in mind i HAVE given him credit in some weeks he have gotten data well..recently he had one preview which was very balanced and I gave him cred for that as well. but alas it lasted just one week.
i mean come on man..just take this week for example..if seece hadn't edited it out it read something like DS sold xxx which is comparable to DQ BUT the latter is just a collection or something...and the game may see a xillia like drop etc etc..i mean it seems it hurts him to give sony or ms credit or something. can't give a compliment without trying to downplay it. i mean ffs Xillia afaik had the highest selling FW in Tales history! who cares if it dropped to 20k a week after that. those are fantastic sales.
it honestly baffles me how some of you are trying to defend him here.

In-Kat-We-Trust Brigade!
"This world is Merciless, and it's also very beautiful"
For All News/Info related to the PlayStation Vita, Come and join us in the Official PSV Thread!







