M.U.G.E.N said:
morenoingrato said:
M.U.G.E.N said:
no he didn't..it was seece (If I'm not mistaken) who changed it to that...and you are wrong many are pointing out his biase in both his numbers AND text. it's obvious..and hilarious. I for one don't find it aggrevating at all..it's just amusing :)
|
His numbers are estimates and can be all over the place, from 100% right to totally wrong, so he cannot be bias in that matter.
And about the text, he is bias, but that doesn't erase the fact he does the preview every week only to be surrounded by complains and hate comments.
|
as yo-john said, if he actually removes the bias...people will have little to nothing to complain or make fun of about. preview will be boring as hell tho for me personally. and when he shows such bias in his text, his numbers doesn't exactly seem like they are trustworthy as well, especially since his numbers for anything ninty are overstated most of the time. so yeah remove the bias and people won't complain about those numbers either.
I mean really..the guy is comparing demons souls to DQ to play down the sales! he does things like that all the time....i remember recently he mentioned some game called frogger or something as a major release yet not even mention Type-0! lol
but don't misunderstand..I thoroughly enjoy the preview..not for the reasons I should be tho
|
But he did mention the great Dark Souls numbers before. And also, he did mention Type-0 this week I think, and has it ever occured you that he did not have any data of Type 0 at that point?
And it is pretty bad if you are reading an article just to make fun of the writter and not for the numbers or the data.
