| chocoloco said: Forgive me for talking about basic theory of biology. This fundamental principle of biology that comes to being almost as close to being a scientific law as you can be without actually being one, is not refuted by the scientific community. I am talking about inate qualities in the way living organisms evolved to survive, not how the human cerebral cortex is able to create bonds based on the ability to think abstractly. The ability to have stronger emotions also works as a reproduction mechanism as it promotes survival for the malke, femal and there offspring. People use birth control because these things are written into our subconcious and are not conciously processed. Of course this is only theory, but an incredibly respected one. If you throw these ideas away you might as well throw away most biology and some psychology as being real science. |
That's nice, unfortunately your "theory" has nothing to do with this discussion, nor does it add anything interesting nor does it answer my question. Your "theory" excludes sex performed by gays/lesbians, and it ignores a plethora of other factors that I won't get into. Besides, it is foolish to think in terms of a dated theory when most people nowadays don't have sex to make children. The question is simple: why let your woman have sex with another woman but not with a man? I doubt anyone here besides you thought "babies", rather they all thought in terms of the social diaspra where it is fine for woman to have sex with another woman but not for woman to have sex with another man.
