| ChronotriggerJM said: Well you still pay to play online (60 dollars a year) which sucks ass for me because I don't play online very often. You don't get any real exclusive features that you could over the PS3 No pre-packaged High Def disk player (ala blu-ray) No bells and whistles that the PS3 offers like Standard Wi-fi, hard drive, HDMI 1.3, blue tooth headset compatibility, remote play, internet browser, etc etc. The choice of games is purely opinionated, but the 360 currently has the "higher rated" library, if that's what you go by. The 360's lineup doesn't currently interest me so thats kind of a negligible point. So if you were going by a "games only" standpoint, sure you "could" say the 360 is more diverse, but if your looking for ANYTHING else, not so much. Considering the only model that really compares to the PS3 is the Elite, and even that doesn't have half the features of a PS3, yet has a higher price tag. And not to beat a dead horse, but the PS3 is still much more reliable than the 360 :/ |
Well for me the most important it's the games because most peoples eventually buy console to play games. For that I think not only the 360 has more game but they're also better. Looking by genre I would say that ps3 has better action games then 360 if we consider FPS as another genre but other then that 360 has better fighting games, rpg & jrpg , racing is pretty close but still 360 has more choices. But the 2 most important genres in US FPS and Sports games are really dominated by the 360.
