Being "the better person" = bad?

[vlad321]

Calmador said:

vlad321 said:

Calmador said:

I know the difference between both words but what does that have to do with anything?

Because by putting two and two together you get the fact that the bully does an action. Beating the shit out of him as a reaction. Two different things, yet you still said, and I quote, " whats the difference between you and him." Sounds like you either don't know the difference between an action/reaction, realize there IS a difference between a respoding with force, or you suffer from some form of cognitive dissonance.

 I'm a bit buffled, about you not seeing what I said. 

The "soul" of the words define them not the words action and reaction. There will always be a difference but that difference that you took note of, according to the topic at hand, is absolutely irrelvant. It's like we were talking about cars and I told you both had the same engines and you said thier colors make em different. Yes the colors do... but were talking about engines and if the engines are the same then that's what makes the engines the same.

Example: a police man see's you getting beaten up in the streets, pities you and goes after the criminal, beats him up, restricting himself to certian amount of force[also pitying him] and captures him. While before that happened, you were trying to bully [just pushed him once] the criminal and the criminal reacted [note I used reacted as in reaction] and was beating you into a blooding pulp, with no pity. Do you understand now? The differences?

G-d Bless

FYI- I'm not insulting you in anyway right now ok? and please don't insult me here aswell.

I am no insulted not worries, nor am I trying to insult you, just saying what I am observing.

Also you are just simply wrong. It has EVERYTHING to do with the topic. Every act has a cause and an action, the bully has different act than the one beating him up after the bullying, therefore the two are different at the VERY CORE of the act itself. You CAN'T compare them at all, in fact. The way you are looking at it is just wrong and simple.

Also you are wrong about the policeman, it's called self-defense and I haev every right to it. Look it up.