Being "the better person" = bad?

[vlad321]

Calmador said:

vlad321 said:

Calmador said:

It's understandable

Yeah I know about not using the abuse in the article, but one or more people had that mind set and like you yourself seem to have it aswell thats why I spoke against that.

I was bullied[name calling] once and I didn't fight back, instead I went to the principle. Principle set the 2 bullies straight and they never bothered me again.I didn't lift a finger and I garantee you, the bullies didn't bother me 100% of the time later. That's better then me beating them up. Now if you have to defend yourself physically, if it's even allowed (I'm not sure yet)... but if you have to then atleast take concious in giving the other person the least amount of damage because whats the difference between you and him if you don't take concious in the other person? The bully didn't take concious in you when he was bulling you, and if you act the same then you wouldnt act any better, with anger and vengence, malice.

You don't see the difference between an action and a reaction? It is as plain as black and white......

I know the difference between both words but what does that have to do with anything?

Because by putting two and two together you get the fact that the bully does an action. Beating the shit out of him as a reaction. Two different things, yet you still said, and I quote, " whats the difference between you and him." Sounds like you either don't know the difference between an action/reaction, realize there IS a difference between a respoding with force, or you suffer from some form of cognitive dissonance.