MARCUSDJACKSON said:
|
Sorry for taking so long to get to this, been real busy last couple days and I didn't want to rush my reply.
"Many more people are waiting for the PS3 to cost less." Explain how you know this and where you got this information. Maybe there are more people thinking about getting a PS3 on forums, but that's not at all a good representation of the average.
Also I think Ms has leverage. Lots of casual gamers are interested in Kinect, and unlike sony, they are at least making some new exclusive IP's for Kinect. The games MS publishes now are very different then the ones it published just 2-3 years ago.
PS2 is selling best in EMEAA. In regions which recently got the PS2 or in regions where PS3/360/Wii are still unavailable. It's selling in North America, but I'm not sure how well. I went into the Sony store and the sales rep didn't even know how much the PS2's they had on shelves cost to sell. It's still impressive though.
Your not confusing me, but you are bouncing around with ideas, with no general concluding statement. PS3 may very well be ahead of 360 with replaced systems. I doubt it because 3 million is a big gap, and MS did extend the warrenty to 3 years, where Sony did not. However all they did was replace your 360 with leftover stock of original model 360's who are also susseptable to the same failrate. Hence why I had two new consoles go on me. Luckily I learned how to b***h and got an HDMI model in the end, but most people didn't, so I suspect that many 360 owners from 2005-2007 may have had to replace their 360, or they switched to Sony.
I agree with you when you say Sony killed PS2. They needed more time for Blu-Ray technology to become cheaper before implementing it in the PS3, that's why it cost so damn much at the start, and PS2 had some really sick games release the year it was replaced. PS3 started out with almost nothing, and I would argue took 2-3 years before exclusive software started to pick up. Nintendo in killing the Wii as well (Wii really needed Pikmin 3, look how lame the upcoming games are), I agree with you full out here.
For 2013, you say there is nothing holding the 360, well I agree. However there is nothing holding the PS3 either, so why would the PS3 severly outsell the 360? Both systems will be replaced around that time, so I would imagine very little incetive other then cheap prices would entice new console buyers.
As for sales pattern, please align the PS3 and PSP annual sales on excel. You will see what I'mtalking about. 360 had a much slower growth then PS3 and PSP. 360 peaked in 5 years, not 3, and is showing more strength in it's later years where PS3 and PSP showed most of their strength in years 3-5. 360 has a very unusual sales pattern because most console peak early and dramatically and fall drastically, where 360 has grown and falled very very slowly.
Also PS1 and PS2 didn't have a worldwide release date. Why is PS3 the only system affected by that?
I don't think Agent will remain exclusive. Rockstar is not the type of company to make exclusives, most PS2 exclusives were later ported to X-Box. We also know very very little about this game. Dead Island was originally a 360 exclusive, and remained that way until only last year. I think Agent will follow a similar pattern.
As for Move, the number of unique Move owners compared to 360 owners is about 1:4 last I heard. Kinect software is far outpacing Move as well.
You assume Sony has big games planned for PS3 next year, but I disagree. Sony has always announced their big games years in advance. MS is known to announce games close to launch. Forza 3 was announced only 4 months before it released, and Gear of War 2 was only 9 months. I wouldn't be surprised if MS announced something big like Alan Wake 2 to realease during 2012.
So even if MS doesn't catch up and tie annual sales with PS3 this year, MS will at least tie PS3 in sales next year if not beat it. 360 is selling so close to PS3, MS can easily do a price cut on Kinect or 360 to gain the lead, or make some ridiculous bundles. I think MS has what it needs to stay #2, and MS is smart enough to do whatever it needs to keep 360 in second. MS is toying with Sony by having the 360 cost $50 more.
What is with all the hate? Don't read GamrReview Articles. Contact me to ADD games to the Database 
Vote for the March Most Wanted / February Results













