Should Nato members have to respect one anothers alliances?

[Player1x3]

Kasz216 said:

Player1x3 said:

Kasz216 said:

Player1x3 said:
NATO and respect shouldnt be put into one sentence. NATO has shown before that it has no respect for international law nor UN when they bombed Yuoglsavia illegally in 1999. NATO are nothing but a bunch of air strike cowards, who are too affraid of any kind of casualties to fight on ´the ground

If it's ok for Nato to involve itself in Libya to stop potential genocide, i don't see how you can argue that it's illegal for Nato to involve themselves in Yugoslavia where there was real actual genocide.

If you don't see Libya intervention, it's odd you'd bring up Yugoslavia at all.  Libya being more recent, and only being to "prvent" genocide.  Rather then stop it.

I never said bombing Libya is ok because I am not very informed about the situation there. I know a lot more about 1999 bombing campaign tho. And why does it matter if Libya is more recent? Its not like the gap is 50 years or something, its only 12 years difference. And the fact, remains, NATO had no right to bomb civilians or any kind of target without the permission of UN. If they did, well that only shows how useless, biased and corrupted UN is.

Yes it does.

The UN isn't a world government.

In lot of ways, they actually are. if not,they should have no right to rule over other countries and put sanctions on them. see the bolded part in my last post. also, i don't know about libya, but here, NATO bombed civilians almost exclusively, after realizing they didn't bring yugoslav army any sufficient casualties.