JEMC on 16 September 2011
| Soleron said: Charlie says it's fake, so it is. http://www.semiaccurate.com/forums/showthread.php?p=132861#post132861 It also doesn't make sense because 28nm is yielding terribly, so how would they be able to get clockspeeds that high? And XDR2 makes no sense because it has less bandwidth than GDDR5 which AMD themselves designed. |
Well, that's dissapointing. I was hoping it would be real (specially the power consumption bit).
Please excuse my bad English.
Former gaming PC: i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070
Current gaming PC: R5-7600, 32GB RAM 6000MT/s (CL30) and a RX 9060XT 16GB
Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.
