|
haxxiy said: AMD promised them this year and demoed a working GPU. It depends on whether TSMC can improve the process in time. I'm betting no but it is purely a 28nm issue and not an AMD one. Yes. Memory bandwidth is not something consumer applications of any kind are short of; look how little DDR3, tri-channel memory or PCIe-2.0 did. The two key metrics consumers benefit from are battery life and disk performance (i.e. SSDs). Funny you should say that; Intel announced two days ago that scaling is dead. For real. http://download.intel.com/newsroom/kits/idf/2011_fall/pdfs/2011_IDF_Otellini_Opening_Keynote.pdf Page 11. But before it is dead it will become very expensive. Many companies already stopped in-house process nodes (notably TI and AMD). Several foundries stopped bothering to develop new nodes (Chartered and UMC). Currently we only have Intel, Globalfoundries/IBM/Samsung and TSMC doing development. I think IBM and Samsung won't bother to go to 16nm on actual production and TSMC will give up on 11nm due to the exponentially rising costs. Intel and Globalfoundries will be the last companies standing when scaling stops.
|







