Kasz216 said:
If it's ok for Nato to involve itself in Libya to stop potential genocide, i don't see how you can argue that it's illegal for Nato to involve themselves in Yugoslavia where there was real actual genocide. If you don't see Libya intervention, it's odd you'd bring up Yugoslavia at all. Libya being more recent, and only being to "prvent" genocide. Rather then stop it. |
I never said bombing Libya is ok because I am not very informed about the situation there. I know a lot more about 1999 bombing campaign tho. And why does it matter if Libya is more recent? Its not like the gap is 50 years or something, its only 12 years difference. And the fact, remains, NATO had no right to bomb civilians or any kind of target without the permission of UN. If they did, well that only shows how useless, biased and corrupted UN is.







