brendude13 said:
I'm not talking about Nintendo, I'm talking about the Tales series specifically. I'm surprised at how well Lost Odyssey sold to be honest, those are some decent numbers. Enough to convince me that JRPG's sell well on the XBOX 360? No. It doesn't matter if they sold well, it's the fact that if they were moved to another console, they would have sold better and the same people would have bought the game. I bought my XBOX 360 for Tales of Vesperia, it was the only game I bought my XBOX 360 for and that really pissed me off, having to jump to another console just because I had a huge interest in one game. People follow the games, not the console. I will also admit you are right, in the West JRPG's sell pretty close on both platforms. Microsoft are trying to steal the JRPG crowd while SONY try to steal the FPS / TPS crowd, they are basically trying to steal eachothers fanbase without paying any attention to their own. This is the reason why I think JRPG's have been so mediocre and hard to come by this generation. They aren't differentiating themselves from eachother, that's the real problem, they are making their consoles as similar as possible and the only consoles that JRPG's can find success on are the handhelds. As for the PS3 JRPG's you named, those games aren't big names and were most likely silent releases in the West, I am even more dissapointed at the Valkyria Chronicles sales, I thought it would have sold more than that. There aren't that many decent PS3 exclusive JRPG's to bring into the equation, I know I always say this, but thank god 2012 is looking better for the genre, I just hope they sell well. |
I kind of agree with you, but this arguement is not limited to JRPG's. 3rd party exclusives all together make no sense, especially when the PS3 and 360 are so similar. I think all JRPG's should be multiplatform because had I not boughten a PS3, I would never have enjoyed Valkyria Chronicles.
You make so many interesting points, I dunno what to tackle first.
First of all I don't think JRPG's becoming exclusives on various platforms (Tales/XenoBlade for Wii, Tales/Lost Odyssey for 360, Tales/Valkyria Chronicles for PS3) is the reason why we are seeing less JRPG's and more mediocre ones. It's more so because the Japanese audience is migrating to handhelds. Dragon Quest IX for instance was a DS title, not a PS360 one, and it's the best selling Dragon Quest to date. It's just easier to make JRPG's for handhelds, and lets face it, the genre is, and has always been reletivly niche. The only real JRPG's to ever show strong (not just good) sales are Final Fantasy's, and a handful of Square enix SNES JRPG's. So why make them for home consoles when the main JRPG market mainly plays on handhelds?
As for Valkryia Chronicles, I thought it sold quite well. Look into Sega JRPG's and see how much they normally sell. I believe Valkyria Chronicles is among the best selling. Also Lost Odyssey is a really good game, I'm really surprised it didn't break 1 million.
As for Tales of... The franchise has had such a weird history, and most of their games never get localized.
I just wish Tales of Vesperia released outside of Japan for PS3, and I wish Tales of Xillia went multi-platform. I guess however Namco likes to mock us. I just hope any future handheld Tales of Games get localized because none of the DS ones did. I hope Tales of Graces gets localized too.
You've only played Vesperia correct? Get Abyss for PS2 (if your PS3 is BC).
What is with all the hate? Don't read GamrReview Articles. Contact me to ADD games to the Database 
Vote for the March Most Wanted / February Results













