Kasz216 said:
Then when it's done forty five thousand people are out of jobs? You can believe what you want, but even the staunchest liberal doesn't usually try and argue government is more efficent then charity. |
Explain to me how giving money for nothing is better than giving money for something. Oh and I never said anything about government. I said instead of giving to charity, the rich people should instead band together and make a national railway system.
Oh, and it's not 45 thousand people out of jobs....it's 45 thousand newly skilled workers out of jobs, who are now qualified to do similar work. It's both school and employment.









