By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

I'm not disappointed at all. Yeah it would be nice, but I would rather what we do have be the best it is.

Please I am not digging here so dont react O.K.

When DF and the like tested GT5 for Framerate, and everyone was like ahh look GT5 drops to 48 FPS.... blah blah blah. It's interesting to note that it mainly happened at night racing. So Turn 10 have a point.

And maybe the reason the track detail in GT5 is not that high, is due to the weather effects added.

Again the bit about time to. Polyphony Digital answered the critics about only having a certain amount of premium cars, as being not enough time.
Interesting that Turn 10 say implementing weather for every track etc would have been impossible in the timeframe unless the used Xbox original cars etc etc.

What I get from this right now Turn 10 have given us a fully concentrated game.

Every car has the same detail on track. Every track has the highest detail they could get. Rather than sacrifice some of the cars detail ( some premium, some not ). Constant 60 fps, rather than excepting dips. Etc etc.

IMO things that reviewers moaned about in GT5 are down to maybe lack of time because night racing and weather was included.

P.S. I like that Turn 10 wont do wet racing until they get the actual tyre data from Pirrelli. That is commitment. Anyone can simulate it being more slippery. But it isnt quite like it without the real data.

Nice Turn 10.

Just give me perfection of what you do have. The only race I watched at night anyway was Singapore F1. Which is more like daylight. LOL.