The Perfect Game Review

[vlad321]

Runa216 said:

mjo011 said:
I shared some thoughts about the scoring system back in July in this thread:

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=131251&page=1#

I do operate on a full spectrum, but to be honest, when it comes to games, it's a lot harder to find examples of stuff that has NO redeemable qualities.  almost all games out there ARE varying shades of good.  it's very rare to see a game that is poorly made, poorly presented, and has no value.  even the worst games (Duke Nukem Forever, for example) that are released to the mainstream still have good parts.  I had fun in some parts of that game, and I gave that a 37 (I did the review for this site).  

While I do agree that it sucks that game review seems to be constrained within 30-40% of the total scale, but that's because that's what most games ARE.  few games are BAD or TERRIBLE, but many are overrated.  

I see you failed to heed my advice and did not read up on statistics...