Faxanadu said:
sapphi_snake said:
Faxanadu said:
Rath said:
sapphi_snake said:
Rath said:
sapphi_snake said:
Aren't they supposed to test the blood anyways? Honestly, this seems like racial profiling, only even more stupid.
|
They do test the blood. If you read the OP you'd see that there is a period of time after catching HIV that it cannot be detected in the blood.
|
And taking blood from a straight person and saying 'oh, this person's straight and AIDS is a gay disease, so I'm sure we can use it with no worries' is such a good ideea. This is just another case of demeaning gay people.
|
AIDs is much much more prevalent amongst men who have sex with men in the developed world. That is simple fact. To not use that information simply because some people see it as discriminatory would risk infecting people with HIV.
|
Dont try to use reason, statistics and facts with people that moralise.
|
Homophobia is irrational, so you're one to talk. 
|
I am not homophobic.
I also approve that known drug addicts cannot donate blood due to the same reason. And I do not care if said drug addicts are homosexual or heterosexual.
I really dislike that you are putting your "homosexuals are always discriminated" above the risk of small children being put at greater risk to get HIV via blood infusions.
|
aha just do as you said before, don't try to reason with him, i agree with this 100%
@Sapphi This is nothing to do with being "homophobic" its to do with low risk infection of the blood and higher risk infection of the blood and Homosexuality leads to a potentioal Higher risk of blood infection...so COMMON sense would be to take more precaution in dealing with higher risk of blood infection
