Rath said:
sapphi_snake said:
Rath said:
sapphi_snake said:
Aren't they supposed to test the blood anyways? Honestly, this seems like racial profiling, only even more stupid.
|
They do test the blood. If you read the OP you'd see that there is a period of time after catching HIV that it cannot be detected in the blood.
|
And taking blood from a straight person and saying 'oh, this person's straight and AIDS is a gay disease, so I'm sure we can use it with no worries' is such a good ideea. This is just another case of demeaning gay people.
|
AIDs is much much more prevalent amongst men who have sex with men in the developed world. That is simple fact. To not use that information simply because some people see it as discriminatory would risk infecting people with HIV.
|
Couldnt word it better myself.
i am going to have to keep this short because my views may upset a few people, but i think the is no need to change the british law and if so make it at least a 2 year waiting period. Just to make sure. But to be honest i feel a lot more comfortable knowing that kind of blood is floating around in hospitals. Hence a life ban is better.
