HappySqurriel said:
I know very little about the Twilight series because I have avoided it to the best of my ability, but I highly doubt the things people hate about the series (glittery vampires) are what makes it a popular series. From the little I know about it, it seems like Twilight was very focused on the target audience and was written in a way that these readers would identify with the main character and draws them into a fantasy that was specifically catered to them. The demographic that was picked was very large, and the fantasy that was choosen was one that had broad appeal and wasn't well represented. While I'm not saying that the literary quality of the works are similar, it really isn't that much different to what J.K. Rowling did with the Harry Potter series. Certainly, there is probably far more to the success of Twilight than simply how it was targeted; but I couldn't say what it is with the little I know about it.
Something like McDonalds is much easier for me to talk about, and saying that every restaurant could learn a lot from McDonalds if they desire success doesn't mean that restaurants should start selling happy-meals. |
That is more or less what I was refering to by saying a braindead romance in there. I also agree that it's what Harry Potter basically had as well. You also said it youself, it had braod appeal. Well that broad appeal is the problem. To have that broad appeal you shoot quality in the foot, and bury it.
Tag(thx fkusumot) - "Yet again I completely fail to see your point..."
HD vs Wii, PC vs HD: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=93374
Why Regenerating Health is a crap game mechanic: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3986420
gamrReview's broken review scores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4170835