superchunk said:
1) basic PC's always cost as much or significantly more to buy than a console. 2) games are insignificantly less expensive only part of the time. 3) PCs generally force you to at least buy a new graphics card every couple of years... when the games are not being made on consoles first. (i.e. BF3) I think if you were strictly a PC gamer for all your games, you'd probably spend more money in a "generation" that you would as a strictly console gamer. Additionally the complexity is there as well. You have to know how to install new GPU or memory. You have to know how to sync a new control pad (granted some are plug in play now) and that first controller doesn't come with the system either (referring to initial costs). But, then again regarding Xbox to PC... online is always free including leaderboards, forums, etc. |
People spent $600 for a console 5 years ago (for that money you can make a PC that shits over both consoles)..... Furthermore $10 is not "insignificant" considereing that for every 5 games you can buy a new free one as compared to the consoles. Considering since over the last 5 years I have bought around.... 30? games, I have saved myself around $300 than if I was shelling out $60 for them. There is no way you can argue it's more expensive (I do hope you decide to add in a monitor to the cost, because I'd love to slap those expensive TVs to the cost of a console and comfortably say that consoles are expensive as compared to PCs).
Tag(thx fkusumot) - "Yet again I completely fail to see your point..."
HD vs Wii, PC vs HD: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=93374
Why Regenerating Health is a crap game mechanic: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3986420
gamrReview's broken review scores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4170835








