nightsurge said:
vlad321 said:
nightsurge said:
Games evolve. Quake and UT are entirely unrealistic games which allowed you to hold a billion different weapons at a time, move and jump around in unlimited different ways with unrealistic gravity settings, etc. What do you consider a "non-scrub" shooter on PC anymore then?
Seems PC elitists have an excuse for everything lol.
|
And that is wehre you are confused. If you wanted to play a realistic shooter type thing, you went and played Delta Force, and not CS. Unless you are trying to tell me it's realistic that you can go around with 1 health and win a round in real life.CS was just the game for scrubs who couldn't handle the quickness and the fast pace of Q3 and UT. Games didn't evolve over the last decade, they devolved into the shit scrub games released now with marketing to try to push it off as "realistic" (when they really, really are not) when in reality the games are slow and crappy due to the limitatoins of a controller and the fact that there are more scubrs who would shell out money for a game where they won't be bottomfeeder every round.
It's hilarious listening people talk about "realism" in friken video games. That's how I know someone has hit rock bottom and is trying to scrape whatever is at the bottom there to defend their scrub games.
P.S. I would take being a PC elitist over a Console Scrub any day of the week
|
It really is a shame some people can't get out of the past. Oh well, you keep enjoying your unrealistic games of yesteryear.
PS - only scrubs use the word scrub. Such an intellectually primitive word. But you are a self-admited PC Elitist and we all know there is no arguing/convincing that type so I will leave this thread...
|
How are those realistic SPARTAN Lasers going for you in Halo? Oh wait... How's that regenerating health? Oh wait.... Whatever you are smoking, imbibing, shooting up,etc. I want some of it too because I like the reality you live in.
Edit: Totally missed the postscript. Your logic is also entertaining.
