IamAwsome said:
Releasing in 2014 will allow them to do 3D and 1080p/60 FPS, but the Wii U already does all of that just fine. Also, Sony and MS will both launch sooner than 2014 to avoid giving away marketshare, thus eliminating that area of the debate. By "considering Nintendo's past" do you mean 2006, when they intentionally held back on the power as a part of their Blue-Ocean strategy? Also, I should have mentioned this before, but another reason the PS2/PS3 jump was so big is because of the jump to HD. It's just another reason that the PS3/PS4 jump won't be as big as you think. Developers are effortlessly getting PS360 games running on the Wii U, not to mention Nintendo touted it at E3 as "having all the latest technology". 2011/2012 tech vs 2005/2006 tech should tell you something reguarding power. 3rd parties are praising their new online system, so that shouldn't be a problem. Now about gamers. You said that "just making a console powerful enough to get Multiplats from PS3 and 360 isn't going to do it". What makes you think that the Wii U won't have anything exclusive to offer? There is Killer Freaks. We don't know what 3rd parties have in the pipeline for it, and we won't know until next year. |
The Wii U already does that just fine? How? Have you played it? Not to mention I said at a minimum. As there are some games that already run at those levels on PS3. As for the laumch date for the PS4 and Nextbox, I love how you conclude that its no longer possible to debate it since you believe marketshare matters. If they arent competing against each other it doesnt matter what their marketshare is. And No I do not believe that the PS4 and Nextbox will be competing against the Wii U. It will be the same way it is now with the PS3 and 360 against the Wii. People dont see them as direct competitors so marketshare doesnt matter. As they arent losing support from the game companies.
And you want to know what the big difference will be from this generation to the next? 1080p @ 60 FPS minimums, Texture quality and animations. Most games are in HD but not full HD, 1080p is twice the number of pixels as 720p, and then to get that to run a 60FPS, where as most nowadays are 30 FPS. That is a huge difference. Now all three of these things will come at a pretty high cost. Will Nintendo pay that cost and release a console near the price the 360 launched at? Doubtful. Especially considering that the controller will eat up alot of the cost itself.
The Wii U will not have all the latest technology for 2011, to even suggest such a thing is stupid. The console would cost $600+ and Nintendo would never release a console at that price point. You may see technology from 2008 in there, thats so they can keep costs down, as that is extremely important to them. I have yet to hear a good thing about their online system, but I must be reading the wrong news articles.
Well 3rd parties arent going to release many, if any at all, exclusives on the system until it starts to sell well, especially considering they could put it on the HD twins and have 100M consoles at their disposal. And maybe Nintendo is going to have a bunch of great exclusives. They have always produced great games. But are they the type of games that are going to pull the people away who play Halo, Gears of War, Uncharted, God of War, Mass Effect, Gran Turismo, Bioshock, Battlefield, Call of Duty, Grand Theft Auto and Assasins Creed? That remains to be seen. But I am betting no, as it didnt happen this gen.







