By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

kber81 said: This one is great. Gameplay? What are you trying to say? It sounds like this - "good-looking game has no gameplay, only crap like this can be fun". We all know.... ? Who are we. When I play racing game I like to feel the machine instead of moving some kind of block on the screen. When I play FPP shooter I'd like to feel the bullets flying around instead of watching some pixelised sprites. When I play horror game I'd like to be scared. I want graphic to be real. Look at lava and the columns - what is this? It is much more difficult to create great graphic than gameplay. When I have to pay for a game (especially when games on PS3, X360 and Wii cost almost the same) I expect great gameplay and graphic - Wii can't provide both of this.
Please. Some of the best games ever didn't have the best graphics. You don't remember it that way, because you remember a great game for the experience you had...this "immersion" you seem to like in your games. Halo's graphics suck, and everyone seems to like it. You like the feel of racing? That's called gameplay. A racing game sucks if it doesn't drive well...if you turn the corner and the car doesn't behave like it should. Graphics come second. Visuals are important in a game...it's very important to feel immersed in your game...but HD and the latest shaders are not what make graphics good. Art style, design, these make the good game look good too. If you can't appreciate anything unless you can see bullets whizzing past your head with particle effects, HDR, and loads of anti-aliasing, then you should just stick to your FPS's and leave the real gamers alone.



LEFT4DEAD411.COM
Bet with disolitude: Left4Dead will have a higher Metacritic rating than Project Origin, 3 months after the second game's release.  (hasn't been 3 months but it looks like I won :-p )