chocoloco said:
The article never implied it ihas caused a drop in the entire market. If you actually read it is talking about a ten percent drop by the company on topic. It only links a possiple correlation and never considers causation. |
Don't mind me. I first decide to not be serious about things and connect The Situation to Wall Street stocks dropping (another 500 points looks like today), and then begin to think that a reversal of a trend where companies end up doing the opposite of sponsorship (paying to NOT have someone wear something) would end up causing things to get unstable.







