In Your Opinion, What is the Better Book Series? LOTR, Potter, or Twilight?

[Xen]

Rath said:

Xen said:

non-gravity said:
I suppose Harry Potter could have been better had it been written as one book like LOTR. With books 6 and 7 some of the contents of 1-5 seems a bit random. That's not to say they're not great though.

I'm wondering though if Harry Potter would be as it is, had the Lord of the Rings (and the Hobbit) not been written.

4 and 5 are easily the best potter books, IMO.

With 6 and 7, it went all srs and just ended up pompous, boring, and far worse than 4 and 5.

4 and 5 are easily the worst in my opinion. Her attempts at writing her characters growing up were laughably bad. I found six and seven pretty enjoyable as long as I ignored the gaping plot holes (almost all of which were caused by her clearly having made shit up as she went along).

I think three is the strongest book.

Hahaha, interestingly enough, I consider 3 easily the worst of the worst.