Rainbird said:
1) At what exactly? 3D tracking? Body tracking? Voice commands? The Move is more accurate with what it does, but Kinect does a lot more stuff. 2) Depends on what you want to achiece. A single Move controller and a camera is certainly cheaper, but start adding more Move controllers for multiplayer or certain games, not to mention the Navigation Controller. 3) How so? Microsoft has made lots of money from Kinect and it's been a huge success, while the Move is a moderate success at best. The technology in the Move might be more mature, but Kinect is much more innovative and has attracted a much larger audience, despite its limitations. As for why a Move 2.0 is needed, why isn't it? The Move might be good at what it does, but why not make it do more? |
1. Controlling games
2. It's usually cheaper for the consumer, making them is cheaper, the R&D is cheaper and the advertisement needed to get people to buy it is WAY cheaper.
3. Because Sony beat them to it years ago. Kinect is only a short term success and only because of the massive amount of advertising MS put into it. Kinect sold more at this moment but beyond that how is Kinect more successful then move? Do you even have confirmation that MS made more money off Kinect then Sony did off Move?