fauzman said:
I think you are totally wrong here. There is NO evidenc e that sony will adopt a paying psn. The PSV from all reports will have free psn (or PSV equivalent) activity and having a pay psn system would limit crossplatform connectivity (as the psv and ps3 will have, and so may the ps4). Also sony will know that one major point of difference that may have added to the sales of ps3 would be that online is free. I dont see sony alienating all its fans who expect a free online system on a par with pc gaming by including a pay psn system. Finally, sony has attempted to garner greater profits with its own psn+ system which attempst to do what xbl has done for MS (though not as profitable). Point is It just doesnt make sense for sony to charge for their psn service - it will inevitably cost them but they have proven they are willing to take losses in areas to get better sales/profitability elsewhere. |
It makes great economic sense to plug the leaks that are bleeding you dry. As I stated before, SON¥'s financial outlook (think globally) is dire and it's options are few. They won't cannibalize better performing consumer electronic divisions to rescue a dud; SCE must be solvent and self-sustaining. I don't see PS3 fans (especially PS3 fans) jump ship just because they have to start coughing up a monthly premiun to enjoy what, in theory could be, a new fantastic PSN experience, and SON¥ knows this.
As you well pointed out, 'they have proven they are willing to take losses in areas to get better sales/profitability elsewhere.' Question is: For how longer? Ask yourself this not as a gamer, but as an investor. SON¥ can weather the initial onslaught pay-to-play would cause among it's users, and still come out on top with a better more profitable product in the end.







