IseeLight said:
You said intergrated, so it seems to me you are just changing your arguement. I'll try to make this clear, a big part of moves potential is working with full feldge existing games and being an alternate control scheme. Kinect does not share that potential, Kinect games are mostly crap, people bought kinect on hype and advertisement and MS pretty much lied about it's potential, nothing better is comming, and when all is said and done Kinect is going to be the failure. Right now you are just following the media, media says kinect is better then move because it sold so fast so you believe it and ignore the actual games. How many people are playing the games that you don't need move to play with move? I don't know, nobody does but why don't you tell me what kinect games in your opinion are worth playing and why. |
dude.. your anti kinect banter is opinion( gamewise.. MS being liars about kinect future is true), what you kinect games you say about Move( not that I actually care Kinect...cuz I dont) I wanted it a Move but have completely lost interest in it because I see crap games. Dude Kinect definitely has more commercial success than Move does.. thats not really opinion thats fact. when i say integrated I did how many games or sales .. more of its xxceptance/adoption/commentment by 1st and 3rd parties in sense.. I cant really find the word.