MARCUSDJACKSON said:
Xen said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
Xen said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
RolStoppable said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
does it have any exclusives that will drive people to the console? i'll bet not so why bother.
i think Rol said it perfectly. Rol also means WiiU but failed to mention it on purpose. |
Only systems that depend on third party software will be affected, because that's what will be available on OnLive. If Nintendo made a system that depended on third party software, then they will get cannibalized with or without OnLive.
|
so we are talking about MS and PC, cause Sony hasn't needed third party at anypoint this gen.
i agree that Nintnedo doesn't need third party but it seems to be Nintendos new approach with WiiU. Nintendo will indeed have there focus on thirdparty with WiiU more so then there on IP atlease thats wht there showing me and thats wht your afraid of.
|
That is absolutely false.
While Sony's FP games are brilliant, they are NOT what mainly sells the system.
|
i didn't say Son'y firstparty sold the system. thirdparty is why it sales now not when the gent started.
think about how this gen started. where was Sony's thirdparty support then? Sony got to where they are on there own this gen
|
They got there on brand name and rainbow hopes, nothing else.
|
ok i got nothin for that one. you maybe (likely you are)right on that one.
|
Look no further but the launch-near launch lineups.
The games are not bad, but they are not what'll sell you a $600+ console, aside from the myriad of other probs Sony had during that time.
