Vita to be used as PS3 controller and offer similar gameplay to WiiU

[Euphoria14]

Player1x3 said:

Joelcool7 said:

Well as much as I think it sounds like a great idea it will not compete with WiiU.

First off the Vita costs like 250-300$ so anyone wanting to play a PS3 game and experiance something similiar to WiiU will have to spend like 600$ to do so. Also that being said many won't buy a Vita and PS3 so how large will the install base be? Big enough for developers to actually take advantage of the feature? Probably not.

In the end the WiiU controller will come with the WiiU and even if Sony managed to get an install base of like 5-million people owning Vita's and PS3's the WiiU will dwarf PS3 in power. Customers just won't get the same quality or bang for their buck buying a PS3 and Vita as they would simply buying a WiiU.

However I find it pretty awsome that yet again before the device is even out Sony is already trying to copy it!

How do you happen to know the bolded statments? As for your last sentence, you do know PSP and PS3 had this feutre for almost 4 years now?

It is also funny that he is saying that since the whole PS3/Vita thing has been talked about since Jan-Feb of this year.

Let it go though since it is a battle you won't win. Everyone knows that Nintendo thinks up everything first and Remote play never existed. Not to mention that many smartphones and tablets can already do things like this.

Like I said though, it doesn't matter, Nintendo never copies and they are the only innovators in the industry and everyone copys them, like when Sony added an analog stick onto their handheld... oh wait... I mean when Sony added console game streaming to a handheld device... oh wait... my bad, sorry, I meant when Tablets and/or Smartphones added handheld/TV streaming ability while also adding a new control layout (Touch)... oh wait...

Stupid Sony and Tablet/Smartphone companies, they should of at least copied right and did both at one time (Touch and console/handheld stream gaming)... oh wait, we heard of Vita doing something like at the start of the year, before we knew anything official on the WiiU.

 

My point? Nobody is copying Nintendo here, rather Nintendo is the one doing the copying, or rather enhancing, although that doesn't count and is still considered copying because they didn't start the initial idea. (This is an argument brought up when people talk about Sony and the dual analog).

I have all of this correct right? I am just going on what arguments were considered valid up until this point, although I am sure the rules will change, as they usually do.