pezus said:
HappySqurriel said:
pezus said:
sales2099 said:
NYANKS said:
sales2099 said:
sept: star fox
oct: pokemon (not a true pokemon....but pokemon nonetheless)
nov: Flagship Mario game
dec: 20m selling gokart franchise
I really see no way of vita winning now. The Head start, the price gap, and IPs that sony wishes they have come years end. |
Because that really affected the outcome of the ten years before the Wii came out.
And as for the desperation price cut and the head start...let's see what happens before we doom a console a half year from release.
|
ur refering to the era where sony was #1.....which was attributed to their own head start and most 3rd parties willing to make exclusives for it.
I am refering to this gen.......where Sony must rely on their own IPs and not the 3rd pary industry anymore.
Suffice to say.........no Sony owned IP can touch Mario/Mario Kart sales.
My point remains untouched
|
A good Call of Duty on the Vita should be enough to "save" it. Not to mention that Capcom will ensure great sales in Japan with Monster Hunter.
|
Portable gaming does not favour the same kinds of game that console gaming does, and a game like Angry Birds is about 100 times more important than a Call of Duty game ... Part of the reason the original PSP struggled was because it was a portable home console, and I wonder if it wasn't hacked and couldn't play SNES emulators how bady it would have sold.
|
Not many people buy a smartphone just to play angry birds...they buy angry birds because they have a smartphone.
No portable has had dual analog sticks before so that'd work very well with FPS games
|
It may work well, but that doesn't mean it will make the game as important as a portable game as it is a console game ...
