By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Netyaroze said:
@Dr.Grass

Ok I should have said you ente the Schwarzschild Radius from your own perspective. From outside it looks like that someone/something never enters. But the Schwarzschild Coordinates say time ends inside. Yeah with the Kruszal Coordinates you could have a white hole but can a conciousness possibly pass a black hole without dying if there would be a hypotetical white hole on the other side ? "You will certainly enter the black hole and be crushed" Not if you die before entering the Schwarzschild Radius. And i am not sure how to survive the forces around a black hole.

To the black hole passing in 1 Ly SURE SOMETHING WOULD HAPPEN IT WOULD STIR UP THE OORT CLOUD AND POSSIBLY SEND SOME COMETS IN THE INNER SOLARSYSTEM. But that wouldnt happen because it is a blackhole it would also happen if a Star passes through the oort cloud.

To the minimum mass of the black holes. I know they dont develop from small Stars like the sun. You think people now how much mass you need so a star collapses under its own gravity when the fusion stops ?

I havent written those posts for a physicist but posted them in a game forum. Black holes are no reason for fear they are no bigger threat to us then stars in general.




''From outside it looks like that someone/something never enters.''

Agreed!

''Not if you die before entering the Schwarzschild Radius. And i am not sure how to survive the forces around a black hole. ''

Eh? Your body would be crushed. That's all I'm saying. That means you die in most people's books.

'' you could have a white hole but can a conciousness possibly pass a black hole without dying if there would be a hypotetical white hole on the other side ? ''

Now you're going too far to my taste! A white hole means nothing can go in, but things can go out. Also, some suggest the matter is transported to another universe or something like that. Crazy stuff indeed.

''...consciousness...''

My beliefs are certainly different to this, but the scientific view of consciousness is that it is simply a function of the brain. Arising from the complicated nature of our neural interactions. This 'emergence' of consciousness would therefore not be possible with a squashed brain

I am not a fan of the above theory at all. Then again, what I believe isn't really important in the context of this thread. Let's just say that scientists have no f%&$ing clue how consciousness works. This is one of my favourite topics, and it deserves its own thread perhaps.

''You think people now how much mass you need so a star collapses under its own gravity when the fusion stops ? ''

Yip. Not too hard to calculate. Its also just speculation of course, but the arguments seem reasonable. Now if someone actually had a working Nuclear Theory then we would be more certain. As it stands, there is no Nuclear Theory, which means the atomic forces (strong especially) are not understood at all, which means that it's merely an educated guess at what mass is required to overcome all these forces... The general Relativity part of the problem is a little more tricky and I have yet to master Einstein's field equations tbh.

''Black holes are no reason for fear they are no bigger threat to us then stars in general. ''

Agree x 10 000!

If death is such a fearful thing then it hardly matters how it comes about.