On the scoring point, I agree with Vlad to some extent, but it's bigger than a single reviewer. Each website/publication needs to decide on its scoring system and adhere to it. If you get a single reviewer being harsher with scores then you get an inconsistent review system that undermines the quality of the critque. However, I do feel using the entire score system is the direction reviews should be looking towards. Too many times I read a relatively negative critique only to find the score is quite high. For most reviews I stopped looking at the score for this reason.








