The Critic's Plight

[vlad321]

o_O.Q said:

vlad321 said:

You admit that you gave inFamous an 8.9 when it was glitchy. You talk of the good old days of reviewing, but I clearly remember games with bugs and other stuff not getting over an 8.5 or an 8. Newsflash, the score system goes from 1-10 not 6-10. Basically, practice what you preach.

@Machina
I blame you for your terrible SC2 score/review and gave it a near 9 despite Battle.net 2.0 being so terrible, lack of LAN, etc.

were infamous' glitches severe and had a massive negative impact on gameplay? were they frequent? or were they infrequent and minor?

You don't understand. Having any glitches at all should disqualify a game from being anywehre near the top 15% of games in a nicely distributed model. But good thing you are around to prove the second half of OP's post true.