By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Pavolink said:

Zelda games always took a lot of time and people to develop, nothing new. This kind of games is one of the reasons many still believes in Nintendo quality.

Ocarina of Time has a long development, too. And was worth? Yes. Not only for gamers, but also for the company itself 'cause they have a base for future games (MM, TWW, TP). That's what they want to do, create a new base for future games.

Skyward Sword will be different (at least is what they want to do) and maybe the next games will be like this one.

BTW, I'm interest to know what "could have be done" with those resources as you pointed on the OP.


As much as I love Zelda games, not so much TP (on Wii), I cannot say I am any hyped for SS... Been waiting too long, and even though TP did some amazing things I just did not get the same epic Zelda feeling I used to get while playing previous games. It was Zelda, but not Zelda. However, I have about 0 hype for SS, sadly, and my interest for the series has really died... I used to be very very very fond of Zelda games, probably my most played series of all time, any system.

As a reply to the bolded part:

Ocarina of Time: Amazing Game - Released 1998

Majora's Mask: Amazing Game - Released 2000

Wind Waker: Amazing Game - Released 2002 (even with Masters Quest)

So that is 3 games, in 4/5 years, on two different systems.

Then you have TP coming in 2006 on two systems... and SS... 2011/2011+

So for me it is drop in quality and rise in development time.