richardhutnik said:
If you know you are being forced to do something that is financially stupid, why would you leverage to the hilt against it, as they did? It is not helpful to spin a story a certain way, in the face of reality that says otherwise, just to prop up a view of reality. It is correct to say that the government cheerleadered lending, and also pushed legistlation against redlining. It is wrong to say, "Well, the excess leveraging on what is here didn't work, because the government made it so". But, you are free to believe as you like, even if it isn't totally connected with reality. |
That's rather simple. It's called government backing. If it all goes south, they'll bail you out.
Basically those government programs that pushed ARM's and high risk loans did so with the guarantee to the lender that the government would pay off bad debts. Which they ended up doing.
That called moral hazard. Loans are lent out based on risk factors to the lender. When the government removes that risk, what do they care if it gets paid back or not...Uncle Same will save the day.
The rEVOLution is not being televised







