| gumby_trucker said: I'd also like to point out that while we were eliminating those two games, we were at least promoting others that were unarguably better, both in terms of effort and in terms of quality. LKS> DS:E hands down as is the case for MH> The Conduit. I agree that there are worse games than those two on the list, but not any ones that I have actually played, so obviously I wouldn't feel right about down-voting them unless I had no choice. Suggesting that NMH deserves 20-30 points more than MH (assuming you've played both) is a ridiculous notion, and one that reeks of vindictiveness over killing the Conduit, which is an average game at best. |
I do believe that NMH deserves 20-30 points more than MH, both are great games, but I had way more fun with NMH and I play for fun not for how many hours I can spent with a game. It is a matter of taste not of quality. As I told you before, I do have played most of the game in the list, I OWN most of the games in the list. I change my positive vote often, but I still don't believe that the game that was a sure bet should receive the most point just because is long and in 3D.
I can even post a picture of my game collection if you want to check it. I spent way more hours with other games than with MH, not becasue is a bad game, but because I think others are better.
| gumby_trucker said: Yes, yes it is. Because what started out as a harmless prank to eliminate one or two mediocre games that were never going to make it to the top ten, crossed the line when you decided to target top of the line high quality releases that are outstanding examples of 3rd party support done right. |
That was not a harmless prank, some games were eliminated without a chance to fight. You have to consider other peoples choices as you are now asking for consideration yourself.
