*Best Wii Third Party Elimination Game*

[gumby_trucker]

flagstaad said:

gumby_trucker said:

Really?

Do you honestly expect me to believe you think Muramsa had more effort put into it than MHTri? A 20 hour single player 2-D game vs. a 200 hour 3-D multiplayer (local and online) open world game with an additional story mode and actual customization that goes beyond changing the stats and reusing the same sprites?? Or Trauma Center, which has less content than a decent sized point and click adventure?? Or a god-damned Rail Shooter running on the RE4 engine and using old assets from previous games??

I do believe that a small company with a limited budget trying to release a different kind of game, of a new franchise in an unknow enviroment is as worthy of winning that a game of a know franchise that was sure to sell several millions, that had a big budget and was from a big company. I know I had more fun with those games than from Monster Hunter.

gumby_trucker said:

You're just trolling in order to attract attention, and trying to derail this thread.

I am not trolling, just voting according to the rules.

Your argument is valid and welcome, but the timing leaves a lot to be desired.... When there are ten games left on the list (which IMO should include games like the Trauma Series and No More Heroes at that point, just to be clear) then we can start debating the pros and cons of a big franchise game vs. a small budget original game. But as long as there are so many less worthy games still on the list there is no reason for you to go after Monster Hunter in particular. Furthermore, if that's your main agenda (going after big franchises), why target MH exclusively when the same could be said about Sonic or GoldenEye or the RE games?

I don't think you honestly believe MH is worse than Sonic or Just Dance or RE Chronicles... Not if you've played those games.
That's why I think you're trolling.