By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
flagstaad said:
gumby_trucker said:

for the record, I think killing off MH when there are objectively far worse games on the list is a bit hateful. Even if the game isn't for you, you can't deny that far more effort was put into it than most 3rd party Wii games. Incidentally, I am only voting the way I am to counter what I view as unfair.

Frankly, if MH dies so early, this thread loses all objectivity IMO.

That can be said for many games in the list, besides If this keeps you and MrT-Tar busy trying to save the game all the other more random players can vote without worry that you are going to sunk their games. It is a win-win situation.

+ Trauma Center

- Monster Hunter

Really?

Do you honestly expect me to believe you think Muramsa had more effort put into it than MHTri? A 20 hour single player 2-D game vs. a 200 hour 3-D multiplayer (local and online) open world game with an additional story mode and actual customization that goes beyond changing the stats and reusing the same sprites?? Or Trauma Center, which has less content than a decent sized point and click adventure?? Or a god-damned Rail Shooter running on the RE4 engine and using old assets from previous games??

I'm not saying these games don't deserve a place on the list of quality 3rd party games, but the inflation caused by your point-spamming is quickly making this thread lose all touch with reality. If I tally up your recent posts it comes out that MHtri is a worse game than Sonic, for christ's sake!

You're just trolling in order to attract attention, and trying to derail this thread.



Until you've played it, every game is a system seller!

the original trolls

Wii FC: 4810 9420 3131 7558
MHTri: name=BOo BoO/ID=BZBLEX/region=US

mini-games on consoles, cinematic games on handhelds, what's next? GameBoy IMAX?

Official Member of the Pikmin Fan Club