radiantshadow92 said:
Chrizum said:
Seece said:
Boutros said:
Chrizum said:
Boutros said:
Imagine downloadable characters for Super Smash Bros. It would be pretty epic. |
No it wouldn't. I'd rather see these characters be in the game from the start like Nintendo does now.
|
They have to stop adding characters at some point if they want to release the game. They simply have to keep a small team who will make new characters as time goes by. It's wrong to assume that a game is incomplete because of DLC.
|
No Boutros, THEY'RE STEALING THE MONIEZ OFF PEOPLE.
God I wish people would think before they post, not all DLC is like that (probably just capcom stuff)
Look at GTA IV ...
Whoever said it WOULD be in the game, it just wouldn't exist.
|
I hope you're not talking about me because I have nothing against DLC in principle. GTA IV is DLC done right. Street Fighter, Assassin's Creed and Call of Duty is my problem. Having to pay for additional characters in a fighting game is not developing new gameplay afterwards, like GTA IV. Anyone willing to believe the additional characters on fighting games are being worked on ADTER the game is released are extremely naive.
|
That is totally wrong. Adding additional characters IS adding gameplay. Having to balance the character and having a brand new character pure gameplay for a fighting game. I would much rather characters then more campaign for fighting games.
|
...?
Fighting games where you pay for extra characters suck. Pure and simple. The devs will be holding back from releasing the game with some characters just so they can make a bit more money later on.
It's another example of DLC done wrong.
