By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
richardhutnik on 21 July 2011
Edit Thread
oldschoolfool said:
richardhutnik said:
oldschoolfool said:
richardhutnik said:
Lyrikalstylez said:

watching people pre order a rehash game like MW3 makes me seriously wonder whats wrong with them

How abour preordering a derivative of "a rehash game like MW3" in the name of Battlefield 3?  Yet, this is what is going on over and over and over again.


what are you talking about? the 2 games could'nt be more different.

Couldn't be more different?  If that is the case, then which of these is not a FPS: MW3 or Halo?  Because if they "couldn't be more different" then something like Halo would have to be a completely different genre.  And, if they couldn't be more different, then someone could comfortably own both.  But, you know what, when I see BF3 vs MW3 it is buy on or the other.  BF3 is NEVER shown to be justified as something worth buying under its own merits.  It is supposed to be something that does what MW3 does, but better.  You get BF3 over MW3, it is said.

As for them not being similar, I give you the Crack chart on the state of FPS titles today...

http://www.cracked.com/article_18973_why-modern-war-fps-games-all-look-same-5Bchart5D.html


I've played both games and they are completly different. Stop being so cynical.

Until I see a justifiable reason to own both, presented by individuals, upon what basis can one say they are "completely different".  Street Fighter 4, Gran Turismo 5 and Call of Duty are COMPLETELY different.  But Battlefield 3 and Modern Warfare 3?  Care to explain why anyone should own both Battlefiend 3 and Modern Warfare 3?

Sorry, I can't tell them apart...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUenaveVupc