Head to Head

[Michael-5]

osamanobama said:

Michael-5 said:

Like I said, maybe I was unlucky and just planed newbs. The game has a rank system, and I'm decent in MP, could easily whip out some newbies. Still I thought about half the maps were unbalanced, half were good. It doesn't make sense to you because, oh no! Someone has a different experience with Killzone 3 then you did......:-O!

Either way, this is my opinion, why must you make a big deal out of my personal opinion? I voted L4D2, and gave my reason, everyone takes in a game a different way, and we all have our preferences. Why do you never try to burn me on my anti 360 posts?

On Corinth, I never played more then 4 vs. 4. Once I played 2 vs. 1, and it was just plain not fun. Do you only play the game during peak hours?

I'll write on your wall later, I'd have to check my rank. It's nothing high, at most I played 10 hours online, and I'll try to tell you where I camp often, but it's hard over writing.

Regardless, I voted L4D2, blanced or unbalanced maps, my biggest complaint about Killzone 3 was the poorly integrated co-op (can't continue co-op campaign in single player, and vice versa). I like how you ignore that.

Always my PS3 posts draw attention, I said bad things about both L4D2 and KZ3.

As for the prior debate, honestly I don't care. You're the type to look up every comment I say about PS3 exclusives and critisize me when you don't agree in the slightest. When I made the old post I only briefly played KZ3 online, and I was wrong when I said there weren't upgrades and unlocks. I just didn't notice them because they weren't as heavily implemented as Uncharted 3, Halo, and Call of Duty. I admitted I was wrong then, but I wasn't spreading BS like you want to think I was. Killzone 3 still doesn't have an upgrade/unlock system to the level of more popular shooters, and it's probably a small reason why it's not picking up with sales (or online matches). Even then, in that thread, you also ignored my main point (Of killzone not having the hype, or prior establishings), and wanted to tackle me on any little detail you don't agree with.

However we are derailing. I'll send you a message about my killzone 3 rank later. Don't feel like putting the game in at this moment. For once people would like to keep their thread related to the topic at hand, and I made my point, I don't need to defend it.

werent heavily implemented? what? you cant get any weapons without leveling up, you cant get any powers without leveling up. how could you play multiplayer without it. its level up system is right in front of your face

Well in Call of Duty, you notice perks in your very first game. When an ally uses radar, when someone calls in a napalm strike etc. Also when you run around you can pick up very different guns. In Killzone 3, you only have weapon unlocks, and some abilities. I don't believe there is anything cosmetic, but it's been about a month since I played. It's not the same thing, except for the cloak upgrade, I think you can basically play the game the same with or without them.

Halo Reach, there are no weapon upgrades, but cosmetic upgrades play a huge role into customizability. Every spartan looks unique. Also game modes are highly customizable. You can build your own maps, pick which weapons to start with, pick abilities, adjust health and damage settings etc. It's different, and I feel more integrated, but that's my opinion. It sells better due to hype, overall polish (co-op setup in KZ3 is just garbage, don't argue with that), and it established itself first.

P.S. Don't hate me because I said half of Killzones maps are unbalanced. Call of Duty has just as many killing points. Isn't there a famous video of a guy getting a KD score of 500 to 10? That's 10, 50 kill streaks average! Most games have some unbalance, unless the maps are completly uniform (like in Gears). The vote specifically asked which do I like better Killzone 3 or L4D2, and I said L4D2 mainly because of a better co-op experience. I only specifically point out KZ3 maps being unbalanced because the poll asked why. The online multiplayer, to me, isn't as polished as it could have been. L4D2 was better, but at the same time multiplayer was often 1 sided, and the game is really short. I did say it was a close call.

People are far too defensive about PS3 exclusives. Let it rest, people have different opinions then you.