oldschoolfool said:
|
Couldn't be more different? If that is the case, then which of these is not a FPS: MW3 or Halo? Because if they "couldn't be more different" then something like Halo would have to be a completely different genre. And, if they couldn't be more different, then someone could comfortably own both. But, you know what, when I see BF3 vs MW3 it is buy on or the other. BF3 is NEVER shown to be justified as something worth buying under its own merits. It is supposed to be something that does what MW3 does, but better. You get BF3 over MW3, it is said.
As for them not being similar, I give you the Crack chart on the state of FPS titles today...
http://www.cracked.com/article_18973_why-modern-war-fps-games-all-look-same-5Bchart5D.html








