leatherhat said:
richardhutnik said:
Lyrikalstylez said:
richardhutnik said:
Lyrikalstylez said:
watching people pre order a rehash game like MW3 makes me seriously wonder whats wrong with them 
|
How abour preordering a derivative of "a rehash game like MW3" in the name of Battlefield 3? Yet, this is what is going on over and over and over again.
|
I dont care for either game, nut if I where to choose Battlefield3 would be my choice to get.....MW3 wheither you like it or not is just a rehash game, I mean I doubt they created a new engine since they barely released one last year!
|
Well, they have two teams alternating years between releases, so I have no idea what Infinity Ward had done as far as revamping the engine. Usually they come up with new engines and Tryarch ends up using it.
Anywho, I am informed Red Orchestra 2 Heroes of Stalingrad is for REAL men, so that means both these titles are for wusses. Well, Red Orchestra 2 isn't out on consoles, so I guess it can't be too real.
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=131622&page=1#7
|
Yeah buddy- preach it
|
I figured I might as well. I am just getting tired of FPS genre being all made the same between all the major titles. The differences are minor, and the battle is over the who would be the possessor of the same form. I posted another thread asking what sets BF3 apart from MW3, and worth getting on its own right, and the strongest argument was the Frostbite engine. That is it. It is like people want to hate on the Call of Duty franchise, just because are popular, and end up rooting for another title that, like BF3, just because it isn't Call of Duty.
So, anyhow, hope other stuff catches on here, more realistic or at least DIFFERENT. I think when it comes down to people saying one over the other, then there isn't enough to differentiate the two.
