By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
scottie said:
@ All the people comparing this to OtherOS

1) The complaint about OtherOS removal was that it removed a feature for existing owners that people most strongly objected to, and this was why there could be class action lawsuits filed. If the source of that picture is representative of the whole, then consumers will be told about this before purchase, making it completely different.

2) It's not the removal of a feature. HD gaming as a feature still exists, and the ability to play on older tvs still exists. It's more akin to a price rise than the removal of a feature.

3) It has none of the "Do we really own our stuff any more or are we merely permitted to lease it" issue that the removal of OtherOS raised.

4) Broadly speaking, the removal of OtherOS impacted upon the tech savvy, early adopters, the linux crowd. Basically, those with the ability to hack and the desire to keep the feature. This crowd, for the most part, will already be using HDMI. The crowd effected by this will likely be those who know less about technology.

Anyway, I don't think this is a particularly big deal, if true.

Also, 40 gb bump in harddrive space, iirc?

Why are you trying to ruing good fun of sony bashing for them with reason and arguments? :)

If Sony were giving 10 games with each PS3 sold those people would complain that they already own half of them :D



PROUD MEMBER OF THE PSP RPG FAN CLUB