How is the Playstation Move more Accurate than the Wii motion plus?

[tolu619]

oniyide said:

kitler53 said:

yes move is more accurate.

nintendo uses software tricks and assumptions about how you are "supposed" to be moving to make it feel more accurate than it really is. if you are playing something like wii sports resort it is really easy to fool the game and thus easy to demonstrate how motion plus is not actually all that accurate.

move (and also kinect) use camera technology so the hardware can't be fooled. this is why frisbee golf on wii sports resort is a joke but on sports champions a real challenge. sports champions forces you to be honest.  as a competitive gamer, my will to win trumps my will to be honest hence why i can't enjoy the wii sports version.

pretty much this, but its not that different, also i find the FPSs to be a little better, the camera does a better job of tracking on Move so i dont have to make much adjustments to get it toperform the way i want. Contrast that to FPSs on Wii and ive had to have made quire a few adjustmets.

i find it funny how people downplay Move but dont have one or even played it. I have both, they are both good, just wish M+ had half the support Move has, hell even Kinect

Augmented reality also provides experiences on Move that cant be done on Wii

  I hope this doesn't imply that I downplayed the Move because I only asked an honest question. And actually, I do agree that the Augmented reality makes it better than the wii for casual games. Eye Pet would be impossible on the Wii and I actually want that game but don't own a PS3. I'm guessing the Wii U will have Augmented Reality using the new controller's camera and at the same time, using the new controller as your active Sensor Bar. I guess Motion+ will have much more support on the WIi U, since the Wii Remote Plus will be the normal controller from now on. They're trying to push it by selling games like Wii Play Motion and Flingsmash(or whatever they called the ping-pong game where the ball is alive)