Zkuq on 03 July 2011
My problem with the current system is that reviewing games isn't an exact science - how do you tell a difference of just one point? And more importantly, why should it matter? Having such a large scale implies that the score represent a very large portion of the review itself because it's so precise. Do we even need to know more than that a game a great (5) instead of slightly greater than some other game (92 vs. 90)? In the end, you'll still have to read the review to get a better idea about the game (and this is no reason to completely ignore the score).
