DaColdFlash said:
Crysis is senseless on consoles. The game was all and pretty much only about graphics, trying to exhaust even the best hardware. The whole game was a whole benchmark and it was mostly used for dick comparison hardware wise. Now the game itself is as you stated pretty mediocre which makes the only good thing about it it's technology. Let's just cut straight to the point: Consoles = Not so good graphics Crysis = All about graphics What's left? Gameplay How's the gameplay? Mediocre Where's the sense in releasing a 4year old mediocre shooter? Nowhere That was pretty much my point. |
But.... I thought that was all there was to console shooters too. Graphics and mediocre gameplay. To assuage your fears, the gameplay of just about every single console shooter is mediocre too, so me saying Crysis is mediocre should imply that it is at least as good as console shooters.
Tag(thx fkusumot) - "Yet again I completely fail to see your point..."
HD vs Wii, PC vs HD: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=93374
Why Regenerating Health is a crap game mechanic: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3986420
gamrReview's broken review scores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4170835








