By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DaColdFlash said:
vlad321 said:
DaColdFlash said:
Releasing a 4year old PC benchmark on consoles. Yes that's what we needed.


Except that the consoles will still not be able to play the game with as good graphics, and eventhough the gameplay itself was very mediocre it is about on par with console games. Basically, what's your point?

OT:

I have always said Crysis was mediocre, PC exclusive or not, so I am curious how HD console gamers will react to it now.

 

Crysis is senseless on consoles. The game was all and pretty much only about graphics, trying to exhaust even the best hardware. The whole game was a whole benchmark and it was mostly used for dick comparison hardware wise. Now the game itself is as you stated pretty mediocre which makes the only good thing about it it's technology. Let's just cut straight to the point:

Consoles = Not so good graphics

Crysis = All about graphics

What's left? Gameplay

How's the gameplay? Mediocre

Where's the sense in releasing a 4year old mediocre shooter? Nowhere

That was pretty much my point.


But.... I thought that was all there was to console shooters too. Graphics and mediocre gameplay. To assuage your fears, the gameplay of just about every single console shooter is mediocre too, so me saying Crysis is mediocre should imply that it is at least as good as console shooters.



Tag(thx fkusumot) - "Yet again I completely fail to see your point..."

HD vs Wii, PC vs HD: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=93374

Why Regenerating Health is a crap game mechanic: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3986420

gamrReview's broken review scores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4170835