By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
dahuman on 02 July 2011
Edit Thread
Khuutra said:
Phoeniks.Wright said:

Oh how horribly wrong you are. People, like you, me and every other person who's interested in games gets to decide what a Zelda game should be. Without going into an analysis of Zelda sales, I can easily point to Metroid other M and say that what that game was doing is not what Metroid should be, since so much less people bought it. Easy.

Sometimes ignoring people is a virtue, but here it screams of immaturity. Running away from criticism is what kids might do, so grow a pair, and maybe listen to these criticisms. As a writer, that's one of the things you should do, yet you don't want to apparently.

And no, everyone doesn't win, since I end up with a crap game, which at least you'll enjoy, but I won't.


By that logic, then, if people are satisfied with the direction of the game, then that's what Zelda should be. You can't both dictate what Zelda should be, according to your own dissenting opinion, and then say that what players think is what matters. Because as near as I can tell, most of the players who have spoken out about it? They disagree with you.

You can't build an argument on two diametrically opposed ideas.

heh.... Khuutra, notice how he says how SS is not a zelda game but he liked the first 2 which were completely different? =P Not to mention the game changed again completely when OOT came out, and the DS ones also play different with different settings than previous handheld ones or 2D ones as well, he's obviously trolling himself lol.