| Phoeniks.Wright said: Oh how horribly wrong you are. People, like you, me and every other person who's interested in games gets to decide what a Zelda game should be. Without going into an analysis of Zelda sales, I can easily point to Metroid other M and say that what that game was doing is not what Metroid should be, since so much less people bought it. Easy. Sometimes ignoring people is a virtue, but here it screams of immaturity. Running away from criticism is what kids might do, so grow a pair, and maybe listen to these criticisms. As a writer, that's one of the things you should do, yet you don't want to apparently. And no, everyone doesn't win, since I end up with a crap game, which at least you'll enjoy, but I won't. |
By that logic, then, if people are satisfied with the direction of the game, then that's what Zelda should be. You can't both dictate what Zelda should be, according to your own dissenting opinion, and then say that what players think is what matters. Because as near as I can tell, most of the players who have spoken out about it? They disagree with you.
You can't build an argument on two diametrically opposed ideas.
